Indian Penal Code - The Legal Chamber

“Masterminds Can’t Claim Parity with Minor Accused”: Supreme Court Overrules Bail Order under 302 IPC

17May

By The Legal ChamberNo Comments

Supreme Court

“Masterminds Can’t Claim Parity with Minor Accused”: Supreme Court Overrules Bail Order under 302 IPC

The Supreme Court ruled that bail parity cannot be mechanically applied when material distinctions exist between accused persons. It held that alleged conspirators/masterminds of a serious crime (Section 302 IPC) cannot claim bail parity with minor co-accused, especially when evidence suggests their active role in hiring a contract killer. The Court emphasized that bail decisions must consider the gravity of allegations, evidentiary role of each accused, and potential witness intimidation, rather than granting parity as a blanket rule. The judgment clarified that "parity" under Section 439 CrPC requires comparable roles, not mere similarity of charges. Facts Of The Case: The case involves a brutal shooting during a marriage procession in Rajasthan on November 28, 2023. The prosecution al...

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 195 CrPC Doesn’t Protect Post-Proceeding Forgery”: Courts Records Safety

The Supreme Court ruled that Section 195 CrPC does not bar prosecution for tampering with court records after proceedings conclude, as such acts no longer affect "proceedings in court" under Section 195(1)(b). It held that fabricating documents in record rooms post-withdrawal constitutes standalone offences under IPC, not requiring court-sanctioned complaints. The judgment clarified that Section 195 applies only when offences directly impact live judicial proceedings or documents in active court custody, distinguishing between administrative record-keeping and judicial administration of justice. The Court affirmed that FIRs remain valid for post-proceeding forgeries. Facts Of The Case: The case originated from a 2005 FIR lodged by the Registrar of Bharuch District Court against Parshotta...

Supreme Court Revives Abetment to Suicide Case: Orders Accused to Face Trial Under Section 306 IPC for Premature Evaluation of Evidence in Suicide Abetment Case

The Supreme Court held that the Trial Court correctly exercised its power under Section 319 CrPC to summon the accused based on sworn testimony and corroborative evidence, which disclosed a prima facie case of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC. The High Court erred in setting aside the summoning order by prematurely evaluating an untested alibi and disregarding live evidence. The Court emphasized that the burden of proving an alibi lies on the accused and must be adjudicated during trial, not at the threshold. The judgment reaffirmed the constructive and purposive interpretation of Section 319 CrPC to ensure no guilty person escapes trial. Facts Of The Case: On March 13, 2016, an acid attack was committed against Dharminder Singh by ten persons, leading to the registration ...