Pranay Sethi Case - The Legal Chamber

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision denying enhanced compensation to the married daughter (Appellant No. 1) under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as she failed to prove financial dependency on the deceased. However, it reversed the dismissal of the mother’s (Appellant No. 2) claim, awarding her ₹19.22 lakhs, recognizing her dependency and applying principles from Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma for just compensation. The ruling clarified that legal heirs must establish dependency for loss-of-income claims, except under Section 140’s no-fault liability. Facts Of The Case: On January 26, 2008, Smt. Paras Sharma died in a road accident when a Rajasthan Roadways bus, negligently taking a sudden right turn, crushed her two-wheeler. Her married daughter (Appellant No. 1) and elderly ...

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a road accident victim with 50% disability, revising multiple heads under the Motor Vehicles Act. It increased future income loss by applying a 40% future prospects multiplier and upheld medical expense reimbursement with additional allowances. The judgment reaffirmed principles from Pranay Sethi and Ramachandrappa, ensuring just compensation with 9% interest. Facts Of The Case: The case involves M. Seetharama, a 38-year-old man who suffered severe injuries in a road accident on 25.06.2015 when his bike collided with a rashly driven jeep. An FIR was registered against the jeep driver, confirming negligence. Seetharama sustained multiple fractures, including in his right femur, clavicle, tibia, and fibula, leading to vascular compromise and even...

Tag: Pranay Sethi Case

Supreme Court Clarifies Dependency Rights in Accident Claims: Key Takeaways on Legal Heirs & Dependency

Supreme Court Upholds Higher Compensation for Loss of Income in Road Accident Claim