Fair Compensation - The Legal Chamber

Supreme Court Rules :Landowners Can’t Get Uniform Compensation for Power Lines

20Sep

By The Legal ChamberNo Comments

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules :Landowners Can’t Get Uniform Compensation for Power Lines

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment for failing to properly assess compensation under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. It emphasized that compensation must be determined based on location-specific evidence and remanded the cases. The Court also highlighted the absence of a statutory appeal mechanism against orders of the District Judge and referred the issue to the Law Commission for examination. Facts Of The Case: A power transmission project titled "400 KV Jhajjar Power Transmission System-PPP-1" was initiated by HVPNL in Haryana. Jhajjar KT Transco Private Limited (JKTPL) was awarded the project, which sub-contracted the erection work to Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. The 100 km-long transmission line passed through land in four districts, including Sonepat and Jha...

Supreme Court Slams Differential Pay, Upholds Fair Value for Fruit Trees on Acquired Land

The Supreme Court ruled that similarly situated landowners must receive equal compensation in land acquisition cases. It held that a prior judicial decision awarding a higher multiplier for identical orange trees constituted a "special circumstance," justifying the restoration of a 15x multiplier over a reduced 10x multiplier to prevent discriminatory treatment. Facts Of The Case: The case involved the appellants, landowners from village Khanapur in Akola district, whose land was acquired by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation pursuant to a notification issued under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in August 1995. Possession was taken in April 1996. Dissatisfied with the compensation, the landowners sought a reference to a civil court. In its 2011 award, the reference court gra...

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Belting Method’ : Orders Equal Compensation for Adjacent Villages in Haryana Land Acquisition Case

The Supreme Court ruled that adjacent villages with similar locational advantages must receive equal compensation in land acquisition cases, rejecting artificial disparities. It upheld the "belting method" for valuation but emphasized parity between villages Kukrola and Fazalwas near NH-8. The Court affirmed 10% annual escalation on sale exemplars and disallowed development cuts for highway-adjacent "inner belt" lands, while maintaining 30% cuts for interior plots. The judgment reinforces equitable compensation principles under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Facts Of The Case: The case arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Haryana government in 2008 for developing the Chaudhary Devi Lal Industrial Model Township near Gurgaon. A common Section 4 notification under the ...