dowry prohibition - The Legal Chamber

Gold, Gifts, and Divorce: Supreme Court Orders Husband to Return Woman’s Wedding Assets

26Feb

By The Legal ChamberNo Comments

Supreme Court

Gold, Gifts, and Divorce: Supreme Court Orders Husband to Return Woman’s Wedding Assets

In this judgment, the Supreme Court held that property given to a bride at the time of marriage remains her entitlement post-divorce under Section 3 of the Muslim Women Act. The Court emphasized purposive interpretation to protect a woman’s dignity and financial security, prioritizing social justice over procedural discrepancies to ensure enforcement of her legal rights. Facts Of The Case: The marriage between the appellant, Rousanara Begum, and the respondent, S.K. Salahuddin, was solemnized on August 28, 2005. However, marital discord soon arose, leading the appellant to leave her matrimonial home on May 7, 2009. Following this separation, she initiated legal proceedings against her husband, including an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for m...

Dowry Death Mystery Solved: Supreme Court Holds Father-in-Law Guilty After High Court’s Acquittal

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of the accused under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC, holding that in cases of unnatural death within a household, the burden to explain the circumstances lies with the accused under Section 106 of the Evidence Act. The Court found the chain of circumstantial evidence complete, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Facts Of The Case: The case revolves around the death of Smt. Pushpa, who was married to Mahesh Singh. Her family alleged she faced persistent dowry harassment and cruelty from her husband and father-in-law, Janved Singh. On December 31, 1997, Janved Singh reported to police that Pushpa died from accidental electrocution while ironing clothes. However, the post-mortem revealed the cause was asphyxia due to strangula...

Supreme Court Rejects Appeal in Dowry Harassment Case : Confirms 10-Year Jail for Husband in Dowry Death Case

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304-B IPC (dowry death), affirming that the prosecution proved demand of dowry, cruelty, and unnatural death within seven years of marriage. The Court emphasized the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, shifting the burden to the accused, who failed to rebut it. It clarified that contradictory defenses (accidental fall vs. suicide) weaken the accused's case, and consistent witness testimonies established dowry harassment. The judgment reinforced strict scrutiny of dowry-related deaths and dismissed the appeal, sustaining the 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence. Facts Of The Case: The case involved the death of Punita (alias Gayatri), who married the accused-appellant Virender Pal on February 28, 2008. Within months ...