The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred by applying an incorrect multiplier of 15 instead of 16 for a 33-year-old deceased. It also corrected the deduction for personal expenses from 1/4th to 1/5th due to seven dependents. Furthermore, the Court enhanced consortium awards, granting separate spousal, filial, and parental consortium to each claimant.
Facts Of The Case:
Sobran Singh, aged 33, died in a vehicular accident on 2 September 2009 when the motorcycle he was riding was dashed by a rashly driven Gypsy jeep near Jhansi. He sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to them on 10 September 2009 while undergoing treatment at Gwalior Hospital. The deceased was employed at Rajaram Stone Crusher, earning Rs. 6,000 per month, and also engaged in agricultural activities from family land, claiming an additional income of Rs. 10,000 monthly. His dependents—comprising his widow, three children, and parents—filed a claim petition seeking compensation of Rs. 26,10,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhansi, awarded Rs. 7,28,500 with 6% interest, taking monthly income at Rs. 4,500 and applying a multiplier of 17. The High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 9,20,500 with 7% interest, adding 40% towards future prospects but reducing the multiplier to 15 and granting a lump sum of Rs. 70,000 towards non-pecuniary heads. Dissatisfied, the claimants appealed to the Supreme Court seeking further enhancement.
Procedural History:
The claim for compensation originated with the filing of Motor Accidents Claims Petition No. 668 of 2009 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhansi. The Tribunal adjudicated the claim and, by its award, granted the claimants a total compensation of Rs. 7,28,500/-, along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the application until payment. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded, the claimants preferred an appeal before the Allahabad High Court, being First Appeal From Order No. 1493 of 2013. The High Court, upon consideration, partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation to Rs. 9,20,500/-, increasing the rate of interest to 7% per annum. Still dissatisfied with the enhanced compensation, the original claimants approached the Supreme Court of India by way of the present appeal, Civil Appeal No. 5224 of 2024, seeking further enhancement of the compensation amount awarded by the High Court. The Supreme Court entertained the appeal and delivered the present judgment modifying the awards of both the Tribunal and the High Court.
READ ALSO:Breaking: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Quash Rape Case After Accused and Prosecutrix Marry
Court Observation:
The Supreme Court observed that both the Tribunal and the High Court had erred in their assessment of the deceased’s income. While the authorities below had doubted the salary certificate from Rajaram Stone Crusher, the Court observed that it was reasonable to accept the monthly salary of Rs. 6,000/- therefrom, as it was normal to expect such earnings from a stone crusher unit. Regarding agricultural income, the Court observed that even though direct evidence of the exact amount was lacking, the fact that the deceased worked on family land was uncontroverted, warranting an addition of Rs. 2,000/- per month from farming activities, thus fixing the total monthly income at Rs. 8,000/-. The Court further observed that the deceased fell in the 30-35 years age group, which necessitated applying a multiplier of 16 as per the principles in Pranay Sethi, correcting the Tribunal’s multiplier of 17 and the High Court’s multiplier of 15. Significantly, the Court observed that both lower fora had “erred and misdirected themselves” regarding consortium, noting that the Tribunal’s lump sum of Rs. 4,000/- and the High Court’s lump sum of Rs. 70,000/- were inadequate. The Court emphasized that separate awards for spousal, filial, and parental consortium were required, with each of the seven claimants entitled to Rs. 40,000/- under these heads.
Final Decision & Judgement:
In its final decision, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and modified the judgments of both the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the High Court. The Court held the claimants entitled to total additional compensation of Rs. 11,34,820/-, over and above the amounts already awarded, with interest at 7% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition until the date of actual payment. The respondent insurance company was directed to deposit the aforesaid enhanced compensation with the Tribunal concerned within eight weeks from the date of the judgment. Regarding disbursement, the Court directed that 75% of the additional amount (excluding the consortium component) be distributed equally among claimant Nos. 1 to 5, being the widow and the children, while the remaining 25% be distributed equally among claimant Nos. 6 and 7, being the parents. The consortium amounts of Rs. 40,000/- each were directed to be paid separately to every claimant individually. The Court further directed that all payments be made after proper verification and by directly transferring the amounts into the respective bank accounts of the seven claimants. The judgment and award of the High Court stood modified accordingly.
Case Details:
Case Title: Rani @ Raj Kumari and Others vs. Kamlakant Gupta and Others Citation: 2025 INSC 1393 Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 5224 of 2024 Date of Judgment: December 5, 2025 Judges/Bench: Justice N.V. Anjaria